The Life and Successes of Alexander the Great
Part 3: Teaching Foes a Lesson Alexander next marched his men along the Mediterranean coast, seizing more coastal cities, this time on the Phoenician coast. One of his main targets was Sidon, the port city that served as the shipyards for the Persian invasions of Egypt and Greece. In 351 B.C., the people of Sidon locked their gates and set fire to the city rather than submit to the Persian leader Artaxerxes. This, of course, made it easer for Alexander to conquer. While the Macedonian king was forcing his way into Sidon and Byblos, Darius was rallying an army 100,000 strong and marching down the Phoenician coast after Alexander. Darius's goals were twofold: intercept Alexander's supply lines and trap the invaders far from home, where they were less likely to put up a fight. Darius got all of what he wanted, except for the last part, the intangible part, which proved to be his undoing in the end. For not the last time, Darius underestimated Alexander. It should have been a Persian victory. Darius had more men, who were rested. He had picked the place where he wanted to fight. He was in a defensive position, which Alexander had to attack. In fact, many historians argue, Darius didn't really have to win at all; he just had to avoid losing. If the battle resulted in a standoff, then Alexander would be forced to retreattoward more Persian forces, coming up from the southeast. But Darius didn't play to tie; he played to win. And this decision cost him dearly. Next page > Smashing Success at Issus > Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 |
|
Social Studies for Kids
copyright 2002–2024
David White