Darius III: the Last Persian Emperor
Darius III was a ruler of the Persian Empire most well-known for losing that empire to Alexander the Great. Darius was born in 380 B.C. as Artashata and was known also as Codomannus. His mother was Sisygambis, whose father was King Artaxerxes II. Darius had early experience in governing and fighting when he served in the army, advancing to the rank of general, and as a satrap, ruling in Armenia. He also had experience as a royal courier. Darius came to the throne through the machinations of a man named Bagoas, who in the 330s was vizier, one of the empire's highest-ranking officials. Contemporary sources say that Bagoas poisoned then-King Artaxerxes III, in 338 B.C., and then administered the same treatment to his son, Artaxerxes IV, two years later. Bagoas wanted to the power behind the throne and thought that Darius would allow him to do it; when Darius proved none too willing, Bagoas tried to poison him as well. The king forced his vizier to drink his own poison, ending the threat. Thus, in 336 B.C., at age 43, Darius was firmly on the throne. He had taken the name Darius when he took the throne, to emulate two previous emperors, including Darius the Great. At the same time, King Philip II of Macedon was organizing an invasion of Asia Minor, in retaliation for actions that the invading Persian armies of Darius the Great and Xerxes the Gerat had taken 150 years before. Philip was killed before he could start the invasion, and his young son Alexander took the reins of both the kingdom and the invasion force. Darius III, as it turned out, had a higher opinion of his own abilities and those of his satraps and military commanders than was warranted. Despite the presence of a massive army of well trained men and a very large number of ships full of well trained fighters, Darius found himself again and again on the losing end of struggles against a much smaller Macedonian force. The first hint of trouble for Darius occurred not long after the Macedonian invaders crossed the Hellespont. In one of the few battles in which Macedonians outnumbered Persians, Alexander and his men won a victory at Granicus. Darius had delegated the fighting to his generals and so was not on the battlefield. Alexander next marched his men along the Mediterranean coast, seizing more coastal cities, this time on the Phoenician coast. One of his main targets was Sidon, the port city that served as the shipyards for the Persian invasions of Egypt and Greece. In 351 B.C., the people of Sidon locked their gates and set fire to the city rather than submit to the Persian leader Artaxerxes. This, of course, made it easer for Alexander to conquer. While the Macedonian king was forcing his way into Sidon and Byblos, Darius was rallying an army 100,000 strong and marching down the Phoenician coast after Alexander. Darius's goals were twofold: intercept Alexander's supply lines and trap the invaders far from home, where they were less likely to put up a fight. Darius got all of what he wanted, except for the last part, the intangible part, which proved to be his undoing in the end. For not the last time, Darius underestimated Alexander. It should have been a Persian victory. Darius had more men, who were rested. He had picked the place where he wanted to fight. He was in a defensive position, which Alexander had to attack. In fact, many historians argue, Darius didn't really have to win at all; he just had to avoid losing. If the battle resulted in a standoff, then Alexander would be forced to retreattoward more Persian forces, coming up from the southeast. But Darius didn't play to tie; he played to win. And this decision cost him dearly. With all of the other major settlements in the fold, Alexander now had one major obstacle left to his goal of ruling the entire eastern Mediterranean: Tyre, which he did so with devastating fury, building a causeway out to the island and then sacking the city. While Alexander was conquering Tyre and Egypt (which he took without so much as a fight in 332 B.C.), Darius was getting ready for the next confrontation. Darius desperately wanted to avoid the mistakes that led to his defeat at Issus. He was still the emperor of the Persian Empire, and he still commanded an army of many thousands. (Some historians, notably Arrian, claim that the Persian army numbered 1 million at this battle.) He could still also choose the field of battle. At Gaugamela, he chose a wide open plain, in which he could deploy his entire army to its best effect. Before the battle, Darius had offered the hand of his daughter in marriage to Alexander, as well as a large ransom in order to get his family back. Alexander rejected both requests. After the disaster at Gaugamela, Darius was abandoned by his troops and fled for safety to Erbil, in what is now Iraq. He moed then to Ectabana and then Bactria, in an effort to more effectively confront the Macedonian threat. The satrap of that province, Bessus, is the one who dispatched Darius. He and two other co-conspirators seized Darius, threw him in an oxcart, and then stabbed him, leaving him to die, giving him none of the ceremony that an emperor should have had. In fact, Bessus took the throne for himself and declared himself King Artaxerxes V. Alexander, in pursuit, found Darius dead. Alexander took the king's ring from Darius's finger and ordered his body sent to Persepolis, to be buried in a royal tomb. The conqueror then fulfilled the conquered king's wish and married his daughter, Stateira. |
|
Social Studies for Kids
copyright 2002–2024
David White